Justice delayed is justice denied. Why did such a senior judge delay such an allegation if he had a point to prove? His remarks r baseless.

Challenging the credibility and timing of sensational claims regarding past judicial appointments, DMK Treasurer M. K. Stalin on July 22, 2014, forcefully rebuked Press Council Chairman Markandey Katju, declaring that justice delayed is justice denied. Stalin questioned why a retired Supreme Court judge would remain silent for nearly a decade, only to resurrect unsubstantiated allegations against the DMK at a moment when the ruling AIADMK faced severe public crises. He pointed out that if Katju genuinely possessed ethical objections during his judicial tenure, constitutional rectitude demanded that he voice them immediately through proper institutional channels rather than saving them for opportunistic political utility years later. Stalin stated that dredging up stale controversies without documentary evidence only demonstrated a desire to divert public scrutiny from escalating administrative failures and widespread corruption within Tamil Nadu. He emphasized that previous DMK administrations under Dr. Kalaignar Karunanidhi consistently respected judicial independence and upheld the highest traditions of constitutional propriety. Stalin asserted that Tamil Nadu's informed electorate clearly recognized these calculated political maneuvers, reaffirming that the DMK's transparent governance record cannot be discredited by baseless, self-serving claims.